Common Misunderstandings About Google E-A-T

Google E-A-T

Written by Jeremy Earle, JD

September 10, 2022

There is a lot of misunderstanding and uncertainty regarding how E-A-T works and how Google utilizes it. Here are ten of them.

A term initially introduced by Google in its 2014 version of the Search Quality Guidelines is E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).

As a result of these rules, Google conducts quality assessments of search results. It employs thousands of quality reviewers to examine a collection of websites and report back to Google any issues they find with the quality of those web pages.

Google uses the input from the raters to enhance its algorithms by benchmarking it against other data. These reviewers employ Google’s E-A-T criteria to determine how trustworthy a website’s material is.

If a page has a positive goal, “the degree of experience, authority, and trustworthiness (E-A-T) is highly crucial,” according to the recommendations.

Google instructs evaluators to consider:

  • The E-A-T of the page’s primary content.
  • Content contributors on a website.
  • E-A-T is referenced 137 times in 175 pages of the current Quality Guidelines.

E-A-T has been a hot issue in the SEO business last year, especially about the impact of Google’s core algorithm modifications commencing on August 1, 2018, on organic traffic performance.

Search engine optimization experts started theorizing that the E-A-T (Earned Authority Traffic) upgrades, which appeared to disproportionately harm YMYL (Your Money Your Life) websites with substantial E-A-T concerns, had a key influence.

Discussions around E-A-T in the SEO community immediately descended into a chaos, misunderstanding, and misinterpretation of facts, as is frequently the case.

As a result, many of these fallacies come from a misalignment between Google’s algorithmic theory and its actual implementation.

Google’s algorithms are designed to surface results with high E-A-T. However, E-A-T does not explain how the algorithms presently function.

In this piece, we’ll dispel ten common misunderstandings and misconceptions about E-A-T, as well as explain how Google plans to make use of it.

1.It’s Not an Algorithm; It’s E-A-T

In and of itself, E-A-T does not constitute an algorithm.

“Google has a collection of millions of little algorithms that work together to spit out a ranking score,” Gary Illyes said during a Pubcon Q&A. There are a lot of infant algorithms out there looking for E-A-T signals on sites or material.”

There are several factors to consider when it comes to Google’s search algorithms, including E-A-T, which isn’t a particular algorithm, and PageRank, which “uses connections on the web to define authoritativeness.”

2.Secondly, there is no E-A-T score to be taken into consideration.

Illyes affirmed in the same Q&A that there is “no internal E-A-T score or YMYL score.”

Both Google’s algorithms and quality raters, who use E-A-T as a ranking factor, do not directly alter individual websites’ ranks.

Expertise, Authority, and Trustworthiness (E-A-T) are not ranking factors in and of themselves.

3.E-A-T is more of a semantics debate than a statement that E-A-T is not a factor in rankings.

At least 200 ranking variables, including page speed, HTTPS, and the usage of keywords in title tags, are used by Google to determine a website’s position in the search engine results pages.

In the rankings, E-A-T has a more indirect role:

Is E-A-T a deciding element in the ranking process? No, not if you mean anything purely technical, like speed, which we can measure.

Different signals are used to determine whether or not the material matches E-A-T in the way people would evaluate it.

Yes, it does play a role in determining a person’s rank.

— (@danny Sullivan) October 11, 2019

While discussing the present system, AJ Kohn said: “I believe too many SEOs assume knowledge, authority, and trust are ranking criteria; they only approximate what the algorithm should do. A lot more productive discussion would revolve around what would Google do algorithmically to affect these issues? For example, would Google use BioSentVec embeddings to decide which sites include the most useful medical content when it comes to health? Even while I’m not sure if they are (I tend to assume they are experimenting here), this is better than, like, “Should I modify my byline to add ‘Dr.’ to communicate more expertise?”

4.Every site owner doesn’t need to rely heavily on E-A-T. Focus On

To the degree that a website’s content is YMYL in nature, Google’s Quality Guidelines state explicitly that the amount of E-A-T anticipated of that website will vary.

People or organizations with suitable medical experience or accreditation should write or create “high E-A-T medical advise,” for example.

However, this is not the case for a website that focuses on a pastime like photography or learning to play the guitar, which requires a lesser level of knowledge.

Regarding YMYL themes, E-A-T is of the highest relevance for organizations concerned with the well-being and happiness of their readers.

Ecommerce sites are also deemed YMYL since they take credit card information by definition.

It is helpful to use this E-A-T meter to show how important E-A-T is to various websites.

5.SEO Auditing or any other SEO objective is not a replacement for E-A-T.

Search engine optimization (SEO) is not improved only by addressing E-A-T.

E-A-T activities cannot succeed without the standard SEO measures, such as on-page optimization, link building, and technical SEO, all of which must be carried out.

E-A-T isn’t the only factor to consider for sites that have been badly affected by algorithm modifications.

After major revisions, getting back on track means resolving a wide range of issues, including fixing user experience difficulties, correcting technical SEO concerns, and revamping the site’s design.

Google may not index the site if it has serious technical concerns, such as slow page load times or crawling or displaying content problems.

Depending on the severity of the various problems that may be hurting the performance of your website, give E-A-T a higher priority than other SEO activities.

6. Google’s fight against misinformation isn’t something new, and neither is E-A-T.

Some SEO experts think that E-A-T is a recent Google endeavor that began around the August 1, 2018 core algorithm change, in light of all the fresh information concerning E-A-T.

In the 2014 edition of the Google Quality Guidelines, E-A-T was first established.

According to my study on E-A-T, the “Fred” upgrade in March 2017 also had a detrimental impact on the performance of 51% of examined websites throughout the 2018-2019 core updates.

Before the August 1 upgrade, Google decreased disinformation and exposed high-quality, trustworthy material.

  • The Trust Project.
  • Project Owl.
  • Google’s talks on combatting misinformation.

7. The August 1, 2018 Update Wasn’t Known as ‘Medic’ or ‘E-A-T Update’ in the official documentation.

It seems that Google no longer gives its algorithm upgrades official titles, even though Barry Schwartz called the August 1 update the “Medic” update unofficially.

As a result, some digital marketers incorrectly refer to the August 1 upgrade as “The EA-T Version,” which is inaccurate and deceptive, given that not EA-T was the only problem causing performance decreases during that update, which was sent out August 1.

8.Author Biographies Aren’t a Ranking Factor in and of Their Right (Google Is Not Able to Recognize or Retrieve Information About Every Author)

All work should have a byline, and each author should have a profile or dedicated page to show why they can be trusted to produce high-quality content. This is one of the most prevalent suggestions to enhance E-A-T.

When it comes to determining whether an author is an expert in the subject matter they write about, Google suggests that quality raters look at individual author biographies.

Author biographies aren’t technically required, nor do they need a certain sort of Schema markup to be successful, John Mueller said in an interview with Webmaster Hangout. In addition to this, though, he advised checking out your users’ feedback and doing a short user study to see how you can best show that the people who are writing for your website are great, and they’re people who know what they’re talking about.

“In an online search, we have entities for really prominent writers, like if you were an executive for the Washington Post, then you had an entity,” Illyes said in a Pubcon Q&A. In this case, it’s not about the author; it’s about the organization.

As a result, Google’s Knowledge Graph recognizes established writers, but it may not identify all authors.

On the other hand, Google has launched several authorship-related efforts in the last several years, so this capacity may be in the works.

9. No, E-A-T isn’t the only problem causing performance declines after algorithm updates; not all YMYL sites are affected.

Recent core upgrades have impacted sites in the health and medical industries and those in other industries.

After each core upgrade after August 1, 2018, recipe sites noticed massive changes. Because most of these sites are managed by food lovers who are all equally competent to publish recipes online, they all have the same degree of E-A-T:

Despite having identical degrees of E-A-T, four rival recipe sites observed significant performance implications from recent core algorithm improvements.

Although E-A-T is a common SEO concern for recipe sites, they face various other difficulties, including site architectural flaws, excessive advertising, and slow page load times.

During algorithm modifications, performance may undoubtedly be affected by these additional concerns.

When it comes to E-A-T, it’s not something you can just “Plaster on Your Site” and expect to see results right away. Immediate gains in speed may be seen once Google re-crawls and indexes newly updated material, but addressing E-A-T takes time.

Given that E-A-T isn’t a direct ranking criterion, it doesn’t quite function this way.

Increasing your website’s perceived credibility is a time-consuming and resource-intensive undertaking.

It takes time to build trust with your users, and search engines might take even longer to absorb those changes, even more so for sites that have been affected by E-A-T-related algorithm modifications.

It may take many months for any effort to enhance E-A-T to be re-evaluated by Google because of the frequency with which substantial reassessments of the overall site quality occur.

But the advantages of enhancing E-A-T go beyond SEO: people might feel more faith in your website, your writers, and your brand when E-A-T upgrades are implemented.

You May Also Like…